<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments: The Lifeblood of Community (part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/</link>
	<description>Talking about Purposeful Online Conversation in Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: metahacker</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>metahacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Just testing whether comments on older posts appear in the RSS feed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just testing whether comments on older posts appear in the RSS feed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-32</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I saw a convention there that seems like it should be useful in electronic conversations too: RAEBNC (read and enjoyed but no comment).&lt;/i&gt;

Interesting: sounds like a parallel evolution of the Word protocol.  Not really surprising -- it&#039;s a very useful concept, so one would expect multiple people to come up with it.

&lt;i&gt;when I post it I wonder if I’ll be seen as wimping out.&lt;/i&gt;

I can understand that, but I&#039;ve gradually trained myself to not sweat that too much.  It&#039;s sometimes useful to express, and there isn&#039;t much reason to waste peoples&#039; time by saying it wordily.

Although, now that I think about that, it&#039;s interesting to note that some technologies provide what amounts to explicit support for this, through &quot;rating&quot; mechanisms.  Various forum systems allow you to, say, rate a post from 1 to 5 stars, or to tick a simple &quot;This was Useful!&quot; flag.  That has some of the same meaning, although I don&#039;t think it carries quite as much weight as an explicit &quot;Word&quot; does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I saw a convention there that seems like it should be useful in electronic conversations too: RAEBNC (read and enjoyed but no comment).</i></p>
<p>Interesting: sounds like a parallel evolution of the Word protocol.  Not really surprising &#8212; it&#8217;s a very useful concept, so one would expect multiple people to come up with it.</p>
<p><i>when I post it I wonder if I’ll be seen as wimping out.</i></p>
<p>I can understand that, but I&#8217;ve gradually trained myself to not sweat that too much.  It&#8217;s sometimes useful to express, and there isn&#8217;t much reason to waste peoples&#8217; time by saying it wordily.</p>
<p>Although, now that I think about that, it&#8217;s interesting to note that some technologies provide what amounts to explicit support for this, through &#8220;rating&#8221; mechanisms.  Various forum systems allow you to, say, rate a post from 1 to 5 stars, or to tick a simple &#8220;This was Useful!&#8221; flag.  That has some of the same meaning, although I don&#8217;t think it carries quite as much weight as an explicit &#8220;Word&#8221; does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-31</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;With your permission, I may refer others towards this material, either directly or indirectly.&lt;/i&gt;

Please do!  Part of the point of starting this focused professional blog, separate from my personal one, is that this is intended to be &lt;b&gt;very&lt;/b&gt; public.  Anyone who is interested in the topic is welcome: I hope to gradually turn this into a destination for folks who care about how conversation works, so that we can have a really vibrant discussion.

And frankly, I&#039;d love to get some more folks here who I *don&#039;t* know personally.  Fond though I am of y&#039;all, we&#039;ve talked enough about this stuff on LJ that there&#039;s a real danger of groupthink.  Some outside eyes are likely to challenge our assumptions, and help us understand the subject better.

So please: spread the word far and wide.  Unlike my LJ, I&#039;m actively interested in having this one publicized...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>With your permission, I may refer others towards this material, either directly or indirectly.</i></p>
<p>Please do!  Part of the point of starting this focused professional blog, separate from my personal one, is that this is intended to be <b>very</b> public.  Anyone who is interested in the topic is welcome: I hope to gradually turn this into a destination for folks who care about how conversation works, so that we can have a really vibrant discussion.</p>
<p>And frankly, I&#8217;d love to get some more folks here who I *don&#8217;t* know personally.  Fond though I am of y&#8217;all, we&#8217;ve talked enough about this stuff on LJ that there&#8217;s a real danger of groupthink.  Some outside eyes are likely to challenge our assumptions, and help us understand the subject better.</p>
<p>So please: spread the word far and wide.  Unlike my LJ, I&#8217;m actively interested in having this one publicized&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Way back in the dark ages I was involved in an APA, which is sort of like a mailing list on paper.  I saw a convention there that seems like it should be useful in electronic conversations too: RAEBNC (read and enjoyed but no comment).  I haven&#039;t seen it on LJ, though I do occasionally see (and post) an expanded version along the lines of &quot;I don&#039;t have anything to add but wanted to let you know I enjoyed reading this&quot;.  I have this odd contradictory reaction to it: when I receive it I&#039;m happy, and when I post it I wonder if I&#039;ll be seen as wimping out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back in the dark ages I was involved in an APA, which is sort of like a mailing list on paper.  I saw a convention there that seems like it should be useful in electronic conversations too: RAEBNC (read and enjoyed but no comment).  I haven&#8217;t seen it on LJ, though I do occasionally see (and post) an expanded version along the lines of &#8220;I don&#8217;t have anything to add but wanted to let you know I enjoyed reading this&#8221;.  I have this odd contradictory reaction to it: when I receive it I&#8217;m happy, and when I post it I wonder if I&#8217;ll be seen as wimping out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/comments-the-lifeblood-of-community-part-2/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Thankyou.

With your permission, I may refer others towards this material, either directly or indirectly.  Now that we&#039;re starting a Blog initiative on campus, there may be members of _my_ community that seek deeper understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou.</p>
<p>With your permission, I may refer others towards this material, either directly or indirectly.  Now that we&#8217;re starting a Blog initiative on campus, there may be members of _my_ community that seek deeper understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
