<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fine- vs coarse-grained group management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/fine-vs-coarse-grained-group-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/fine-vs-coarse-grained-group-management/</link>
	<description>Talking about Purposeful Online Conversation in Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/fine-vs-coarse-grained-group-management/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>George Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I might use the fine-grain controls... but I&#039;d rather that PoCo support &quot;membership&quot; queries. While exposing all the &quot;tags&quot; I&#039;ve applied to my contacts does reveal some information about me (from a privacy perspective) I&#039;m personally less concerned about that. So if the consumer knows that I have &quot;groups&quot; (a.k.a. tags) of &quot;Family&quot;, &quot;Photos&quot;, &quot;Personal&quot;, &quot;Friends&quot;, &quot;Work&quot;, etc, I don&#039;t see that as big exposure.

However, I don&#039;t necessarily want the consumer to be able to see all the contact data in those &quot;groups&quot;. Instead, I like Martin&#039;s concept of dynamically checking and when checking just asking the PoCo service if identity x is a member of group y.

I&#039;ve got a couple of blog posts about this as well.

http://practicalid.blogspot.com/2008/09/tagging-for-contacts.html

http://practicalid.blogspot.com/2008/09/protected-sharing-on-open-web.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might use the fine-grain controls&#8230; but I&#8217;d rather that PoCo support &#8220;membership&#8221; queries. While exposing all the &#8220;tags&#8221; I&#8217;ve applied to my contacts does reveal some information about me (from a privacy perspective) I&#8217;m personally less concerned about that. So if the consumer knows that I have &#8220;groups&#8221; (a.k.a. tags) of &#8220;Family&#8221;, &#8220;Photos&#8221;, &#8220;Personal&#8221;, &#8220;Friends&#8221;, &#8220;Work&#8221;, etc, I don&#8217;t see that as big exposure.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t necessarily want the consumer to be able to see all the contact data in those &#8220;groups&#8221;. Instead, I like Martin&#8217;s concept of dynamically checking and when checking just asking the PoCo service if identity x is a member of group y.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a couple of blog posts about this as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://practicalid.blogspot.com/2008/09/tagging-for-contacts.html" rel="nofollow">http://practicalid.blogspot.com/2008/09/tagging-for-contacts.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://practicalid.blogspot.com/2008/09/protected-sharing-on-open-web.html" rel="nofollow">http://practicalid.blogspot.com/2008/09/protected-sharing-on-open-web.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim E-H</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/fine-vs-coarse-grained-group-management/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim E-H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-136</guid>
		<description>I would definitely use them. I accept friend requests on Facebook from pretty much anyone I have any connection with, but LinkedIn is for professional purposes, and I keep it that way. (Just recently, I got a LinkedIn connection request from a larper from way back. I was never particularly friends with him, and I have no idea even what his profession is, so I ignored it.)

One of the reasons I don&#039;t allow many apps in Facebook is because there&#039;s little control beyond &quot;allow this app access to your information and friends list.&quot; (The fact that they&#039;re nothing but Internet time-wasters means there&#039;s nothing to counter-balance that drawback, but it would still be a tough call.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely use them. I accept friend requests on Facebook from pretty much anyone I have any connection with, but LinkedIn is for professional purposes, and I keep it that way. (Just recently, I got a LinkedIn connection request from a larper from way back. I was never particularly friends with him, and I have no idea even what his profession is, so I ignored it.)</p>
<p>One of the reasons I don&#8217;t allow many apps in Facebook is because there&#8217;s little control beyond &#8220;allow this app access to your information and friends list.&#8221; (The fact that they&#8217;re nothing but Internet time-wasters means there&#8217;s nothing to counter-balance that drawback, but it would still be a tough call.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
