<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information Shadows, and the Difficulty of Anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/information-shadows-and-the-difficulty-of-anonymity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/information-shadows-and-the-difficulty-of-anonymity/</link>
	<description>Talking about Purposeful Online Conversation in Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/information-shadows-and-the-difficulty-of-anonymity/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=157#comment-143</guid>
		<description>I can understand that, but I do worry that these attacks on identity are likely to become only more broad-based, and easier.

It&#039;s true that there isn&#039;t a high likelihood of someone spending considerable effort rooting out *your* identity per se.  But I can see someone spending a lot of effort to break *every* identity on Twitter in a mass attack, and then selling the information cheaply.

To be fair, the commercial motivation for that isn&#039;t yet clear, and it&#039;s unlikely to happen until and unless such a motive arises.  But I&#039;d guess that, if someone comes up with a decent reason to de-anonymize the social networks -- even if only a small fraction of those identities have value -- then mass de-anonymization seems likely...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand that, but I do worry that these attacks on identity are likely to become only more broad-based, and easier.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that there isn&#8217;t a high likelihood of someone spending considerable effort rooting out *your* identity per se.  But I can see someone spending a lot of effort to break *every* identity on Twitter in a mass attack, and then selling the information cheaply.</p>
<p>To be fair, the commercial motivation for that isn&#8217;t yet clear, and it&#8217;s unlikely to happen until and unless such a motive arises.  But I&#8217;d guess that, if someone comes up with a decent reason to de-anonymize the social networks &#8212; even if only a small fraction of those identities have value &#8212; then mass de-anonymization seems likely&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim E-H</title>
		<link>http://artofconv.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/information-shadows-and-the-difficulty-of-anonymity/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim E-H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofconv.wordpress.com/?p=157#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to look it over, but on the face of it, the de-anonymizing doesn&#039;t bother me much. I realize this isn&#039;t true for everyone, but when I post under a pseudonym, I only expect to protect my identity from casual observation (like someone googling me), not a concerted investigation. It&#039;s similar to how anyone could break into my house with a brick, but I still lock the door. It&#039;s deterrence, not a fortress, and in either case only likely to be breached by someone who is making a concerted effort, not casually or by accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to look it over, but on the face of it, the de-anonymizing doesn&#8217;t bother me much. I realize this isn&#8217;t true for everyone, but when I post under a pseudonym, I only expect to protect my identity from casual observation (like someone googling me), not a concerted investigation. It&#8217;s similar to how anyone could break into my house with a brick, but I still lock the door. It&#8217;s deterrence, not a fortress, and in either case only likely to be breached by someone who is making a concerted effort, not casually or by accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
